🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.