🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the UK, and it feels like it’s time for a rethink. As time has passed, an celebration that was initiated as a celebration and reminder of the past, cultural identity and bonds between Black populations worldwide, has taken on a corporate feel, expanding to include events where African descendants are compensated to talk to predominantly white listeners about hidden biases and active solidarity. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests sparked an increase in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what promoting consciousness is for.

The History of Black History Celebration

Originally observed in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the US and Canada in winter, but also in autumn in the Britain, Deutschland, Éire and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The month has transformed since its inception, giving reduced attention to the histories of colonial slavery and fights for racial justice, and greater focus on prominent Black figures in politics, culture, and activism, and broadly celebrating the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the manner the month is observed is a indication of the current political situation. How it progresses is a good lesson in how co-option leads to dismantling: the reshaping of Black History Month has impeded the purpose of it, which is to tackle systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how important it is to reconsider Black History Month better than the current time in which it occurs this year. In the UK, a reemerging right-wing in the form of the Reform political group is top in opinion ratings. In the summer we observed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the history of Britain. a prominent political figure, the Black leader of the Conservative party, is a staunch adversary of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a elected representative gains confidence to say that a lack of white people in specific city neighborhoods is a reason for concern. Simultaneously, far-right parties are growing in the EU as a entirety.

In the America, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, often successfully, to the highest courts of the country. A campaign to remove African American heritage and experience from the historical documents is ongoing. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by depicting the United States “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Given these circumstances, the observance symbolises how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or stripped of political content celebrations of historical achievements, rather than confronting the realities of the contemporary world. It also shows how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the broader ongoing work that is required. A university professor, a prof at an educational institution, put it best when she raised concerns about the fleeting superficial actions of the month. “The problem with embracing a superficial method”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month evolves into a brief show rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to adapt, revise and extend actions for racial equality and recognition in such moments of dejection and worry is a challenging endeavor. There is a inclination to just do away with things like Black History Month altogether, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an time that has failed to deliver.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and tradition of activism for racial justice – community-based BLM initiatives, DEI programs, and certainly, even commercial engagements – form an framework that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not just to decay as the politics moves on (and in fact, regresses), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? Well, first, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is dispersed throughout the annual calendar (as some institutions are already commencing), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) incorporated into school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not evade politics, and provides room for individuals, particularly young people, to express their concerns and stories. What use is mere awareness of the bygone era when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of extreme conservative demonstrations in the street? Organizations who mark it should not be reassured with the neutral terminology of “unconscious bias” and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but confronted with the risks that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. In short, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, pressing, and responsive. Maybe an total re-identification is in order – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.